Close this search box.

4 DEI Practical ways in which Business Leaders Should Rank


Many actions can improve diversity, equity, and inclusion, but organizations often lack data to know how effective they are.

Understand the measurable impact of service delivery teams (ERGs).

ERGs (also called parallel groups) are very common in the private sector; are widely thought to support participatory workplace cultures. ERGs can promote the development of team member leadership, cooperation, and trust; we have seen many of these benefits in our organizations. As more companies strengthen and expand their ERGs, they learn more about the key processes that distinguish effective ERGs; such as ensuring that there is a major active sponsor, including ERGs in key organizational decisions; financial compensation to ERG leaders in their time.

More research is needed, however; to clearly understand how these and other best practices can effectively drive the effects of strong DEI. In order to improve the way they interact with ERGs, companies should consider tracking what ERGs have, what roles and responsibilities members have; the level of involvement among senior executives, and how retention and/or development outcomes differ for staff members. ERG compared to the average number of employees. AT&T, for example, has linked a high level of black employment retention (85.6 percent in 2015); to The NETwork, an important tool for identifying candidates.

Evaluate the effectiveness of DEI training for human managers.

DEI training brings a lot of different things and can be a challenge for companies to get it right. When it comes to the efforts of a company as a whole, we know that compulsory training may not have the same results, but voluntary training can produce strong results. It is unclear how human managers can be effectively trained to support DEI outcomes, given their strong influence on the day-to-day workforce experience. Management training is common in U.S. companies. But these studies rarely address the unequal results of employees or processes that build relationships and disrupt bias. When companies offer DEI-based management training, evaluation often focuses on management participation and training satisfaction; companies rarely estimate how effective these times are in an inclusive, equitable work environment. However, given the cost of disrespecting responsible managers of the various teams, the business issue of improved tracking training for DEI management is compelling.

Examine performance appraisals for bias.

Performance reviews are a common practice for many tasks. But these studies are seldom objective, a study that confirms the persistence of racial and sexual discrimination. The first step to dealing with this bias is to balance. Companies should start by researching performance results and summary descriptions of race, gender, and other identity groups (e.g., educational background, age, etc.) to identify where there are differences. Updating historical quantity data for engagement, promotions, and cut-off rates across all groups can reveal patterns and trends. Combined with team member quality emotional data on member feelings, management support, and trust, this information can be a powerful tool for understanding system errors and establishing a case for change within senior leadership.

Evaluate the correlation between team member benefits and outcomes.

Profits are a major factor in attracting and retaining talent. In fact, about 80% of workers say they would rather have more benefits than pay rises. As millions struggle to meet basic needs such as transportation and childcare, as well as increased attention throughout the epidemic in terms of difficulty and professional development assistance, employers need to rethink their package of benefits, in proportion to mindfulness. Companies are quick to recognize this fact.

Read more:


Companies can strengthen the impact of almost all DEI programs by deliberate measurement and testing. Indeed, the only way to build U.S. workers is to work involving everyone so that companies can start tracking their DEI investments and share their profits more widely. Dealing with these four historically ill-studied processes is an important first step in the broader effort to integrate DEI programs into data and contribute to a growing research base on how to deliver the need for poorly represented talent.

Subscribe Newsletter